Connect with us

The Russia Investigation

Ty Cobb Out At White House As Another Trump Legal Team Shake Up Signals Possible Change In Strategy



WASHINGTON, May 2, 2018 — White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders on Wednesday announced the retirement of Ty Cobb, the veteran Washington attorney who has managed the Trump administration’s relationship with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office, and the hiring of Emmett Flood, who served on President Bill Clinton’s legal team during impeachment proceedings in 1998.

“Emmet Flood will be joining the White House Staff to represent the President and the administration against the Russia witch hunt,” Sanders said in a statement. “Ty Cobb, a friend of the President, who has done a terrific job, will be retiring at the end of the month.”

Like Cobb, Flood is a veteran attorney who is respected in Washington, DC legal circles. His addition to Trump’s legal team, the possibility of which was reported by The New York Times earlier this year, brings potentially relevant — and difficult to find — experience to the White House legal team. Flood was one of many attorneys who represented then-President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. He later served in the White House Counsel’s office under George W. Bush, where he was that office’s point person in dealing with congressional investigations, including the probe into Bush’s decision to dismiss a group of United States attorneys.

As has been the case with many sudden personnel announcements, Sanders said Cobb had been discussing his departure with Chief of Staff John Kelly for “several weeks,” and that Cobb informed Kelly last week that he would, in fact, be leaving the White House, where he has held the title of Special Counsel and served alongside White House Counsel Don McGahn.

Cobb, a respected veteran of beltway legal circles, joined the White House Counsel’s office in July of 2017, two months after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed former FBI director Robert Mueller to lead the investigation into possible ties between President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russian government.

His addition to the White House legal team brought much-needed gravitas and expertise to a White House Counsel’s office lacking in experience dealing with intense federal investigations, as well as an end to media reports questioning whether Trump’s legal team was up to the job of dealing with a prosecutor of Mueller’s caliber.

For a time, Cobb’s strategy of engaging, cooperating and assuring a restless president that the investigation would soon come to an end combined with McGahn’s threats of resignation to restrain Trump from moving to fire the former FBI director or attacking him  directly, even as his surrogates waged a scorched-earth public relations campaign to define Mueller’s investigation as a “witch hunt” conducted by a team of Democrats (Mueller is a lifelong Republican).

But President Trump has appeared to grow tired of Cobb’s strategy, as evidenced by his decision to begin attacking Mueller directly via Twitter earlier this year, even as he continues to contemplate the possibility of heading off a grand jury subpoena by voluntarily sitting for a formal interview.

Although Trump once expressed enthusiasm about the idea, which had been a source of tension between him and his legal team which led to the departure of John Dowd, another veteran Washington lawyer who until recently headed up the president’s personal legal team.

While Flood’s name was floated as a possible replacement for Dowd, he will not be serving on Trump’s personal legal team, which is currently led by Jay Sekulow, an experienced civil litigator who moonlights as a talk radio host, and Rudolph Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City who made his political bones as a federal prosecutor. Unlike Flood, however, neither possess any recent experience in criminal law or dealing with complex federal investigations.

Despite the reports of Trump’s frustration with Cobb’s strategy of conciliatory cooperation, a senior administration would not say if such tensions or disagreements on strategy had anything to do with Cobb’s decision to exit at a time when the investigation appears to be moving into a new phase and the president’s rhetoric is becoming increasingly combative.

But in an interview with CBS News, Cobb dismissed the idea that his departure and Flood’s arrival marked a change in strategy for the White House.

“People will think this means we’re going to war but I would not read that into this,” said Cobb, who added that he did not mind being described as a “peacemaker,” and that President Trump had wanted him to stay on.

Cobb explained that the task for which left a lucrative career in private practice was largely completed.

“The key point is all the documents requested by the Special Counsel were produced by late October,” he said. “All the interviews with White House personnel were conducted by late January. The bulk of the work was done. It’s easier for me to leave now.”


Andrew Feinberg is the Managing Editor and lead Washington Correspondent for Breakfast Media, and covers the White House, Capitol Hill, courts and regulatory agencies for BeltwayBreakfast and He has written about policy and politics in the nation's capital since 2007.

The Russia Investigation

Citing GOP Congressman’s Alternative Explanation, Trump Denies Anger At Sessions Was Due To Russia Investigation



WASHINGTON, May 30, 2018 — In a series of tweets, President Donald Trump said Wednesday that his frustration with Attorney General Jeff Sessions stemmed from a lack of candor over Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from having any involvement in the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The extent of the president’s anger at Sessions was revealed Tuesday in a New York Times story detailing how he’d demanded that Sessions reverse his decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation — a demand Sessions refused.

Trump subsequently ordered then-Chief of Staff Reince Priebus to ask for Sessions’ resignation shortly after he’d recused himself, but Priebus never completed the task. The president would later savage his Attorney General in a series of tweets, reportedly hoping he’d be humiliated enough to resign and pave the way for a more “loyal” replacement who’d presumably sideline the investigation.

The president’s tweets invoked an alternative explanation for the story offered by South Carolina Congressman Trey Gowdy, in which Gowdy said Trump’s anger at Sessions stemmed not from Sessions’ failure to “protect” him from the ongoing investigation into whether the Trump campaign had any ties to Russia but from Sessions failure to inform Trump before he took the job.

“I think what the President is doing is expressing frustration that Attorney General Sessions should have shared these reasons for recusal before he took the job, not afterward. If I were the President and I picked someone to be the country’s chief law enforcement officer, and they told me later, ‘oh, by the way, I’m not going to be able to participate in the most important case in the office,’ I would be frustrated too…and that’s how I read that,” Gowdy said before imagining the president asking Sessions why he didn’t inform Trump and allow him to pick somebody else out of the many “really good lawyers in the country.”

“I wish I did!” Trump added.

But as a previous New York Times story reported, Trump’s anger at Sessions stemmed from his view that the job of the Attorney General — the nation’s chief law enforcement officer — was more akin to a “fixer” who’d “protect” the president from investigations. He also reportedly demanded that White House Counsel Donald McGahn interceded to dissuade Sessions from recusing himself.

McGahn did carry out the president’s request, but was unsuccessful, as Sessions refused and recused himself in accordance with Justice Department rules.

Trump also reportedly claimed that he expected the head of the Justice Department to protect him in the way then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy supposedly protected his brother, President John F. Kennedy. He reportedly asked, “Where’s my Roy Cohn?” referring to the onetime counsel to Sen. Joseph McCarthy, R-Wisc., who represented Trump during his early years as a New York real estate developer.


Continue Reading

The Russia Investigation

Justice Department Watchdog To Expand Probe After Trump Meets With Wray, Coates, Rosenstein



WASHINGTON, May 21, 2018 — The Department of Justice Office of Inspector General will expand its new investigation into the use of an informant in the FBI’s Trump-Russia to include “to include any irregularities with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s or the Department of Justice’s tactics concerning the Trump Campaign,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement Monday.

Additionally, Sanders said White House Chief of Staff John Kelly “will immediately set up a meeting with the FBI, DOJ, and DNI together with Congressional Leaders to review highly classified and other information they have requested.”

The announcement came shortly after Director of National Intelligence Dan Coates, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray left the White House after a meeting with President Trump to which he’d summoned them earlier that day.

Trump ordered the meeting a day after he’d announced in a tweet that he “hereby demanded that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes – and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration.”

Although Rosenstein is nominally the Deputy Attorney General, he is the Acting Attorney General for the purposes of anything having to do with the investigation into the 2016 campaign because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself last year after it was discovered that he’d met with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during 2016, when he was an adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign.

The decision by Rosenstein to assign the DOJ’s internal watchdog the investigation into FBI’s use of an informant when looking into whether members of his Trump’s 2016 campaign worked with the Russian government rather than open a criminal investigation appeared to head off a confrontation that could have provoked a constitutional crisis.

Today’s announcement that the probe will be expanded appeared meant to mollify the president, but it is unclear whether it will satisfy his allies’ demand for a parallel investigation they can use to cloud the waters around Mueller’s investigation.

One potential confrontation that remains, however, is whether the FBI will reveal all it knows about the 2016 probe to House Republicans who’ve been pushing for more and more information.

While they maintain that their requests have been made as part of their normal oversight role, media reports have indicated that Justice Department officials are concerned that some Trump partisans, particularly Reps. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, are using their oversight authority to gain intelligence on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation in order to pass it to the White House.



Continue Reading

The Russia Investigation

Trump Says He’ll Order Investigation Into His Own Claim That FBI ‘Infiltrated’ 2016 Campaign



WASHINGTON, May 20, 2018 — President Donald Trump went back to Twitter once more Sunday afternoon to announce that he’d be ordering the Department of Justice to investigate whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation had “infiltrated” his campaign “for political purposes.”

“I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration,” Trump wrote.

What apparently set Trump off was a series of stories in The New York Times which shed light on the early stages of the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and any possible coordination with the Trump campaign.

A separate report story this weekend also revealed that the FBI and the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller have also been looking whether other countries besides Russia sought to work on the Trump campaign’s behalf.

Trump and his allies in conservative media have seized on the FBI’s use of an outside informant who met with two figures within the Trump campaign as evidence that the FBI, as Trump put it, “infiltrated” the campaign.

However, Trump and his allies have shown no evidence that the FBI was acting on behalf of the Obama administration and not in the normal counterintelligence role it has had since the days of the Cold War, nor has any been shown to exist.

In fact, the New York Times story detailing the early stages of the investigation, which the FBI later codenamed “Crossfire Hurricane,” was kept from Obama administration political appointees within the DOJ, noting that at the beginning, only five people within the FBI were aware of the probe, which began after Trump campaign adviser George Papadapoulos drunkenly bragged to an Australian diplomat that Russia had “dirt” on Clinton.

Because Attorney General Jeff Sessions has recused himself from any matters involving the Russia investigation or Trump’s 2016 campaign, the actual decision as to whether or not to launch an investigation as Trump has asked will fall to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

While the president can make referrals to the Department of Justice — as can any federal official — longstanding Department of Justice rules and procedures do not permit the president to directly order an investigation himself.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2018 Breakfast Media LLC Send tips, advertiser/sponsor inquiries, and press releases to press(at)