Connect with us

Foreign Policy

Trump Says ‘We’ll See What Happens’ With North Korea Summit After Bolton’s Demands Prompt Cancellation Threats

Published

on

White House National Security Adviser during a recent appearance on CNN's "State of the Union" (screengrab image)

WASHINGTON, May 16, 2018 — President Donald Trump on Wednesday told reporters he hadn’t heard anything from North Korea regarding threats to cancel his planned summit unless the United States walks back demands for leader Kim Jong Un to agree to a disarmament plan along the lines of those agreed to by the former leaders of Iraq and Libya.

“We haven’t been notified at all, we’ll have to see,” Trump said during an Oval Office photo opportunity with Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev. “We haven’t received anything, we haven’t heard anything. We will see what happens.”

Plans for the June 12 summit, which is set to take place in Singapore and would be the first between an American president and a member of the hereditary dictatorship that has led North Korea since the end of the Korean War, hit a snag Wednesday after the North canceled planned joint talks with South Korea over its participation in joint military drills with the United States.

While drills are a longstanding annual event, they’ve long been a sticking point in relations between Seoul and Pyongyang, which sees them as a provocation and maintains — incorrectly — that they are a dress rehearsal for an invasion by the United States and South Korea. This year’s exercises were originally set for earlier this year but were postponed as a goodwill gesture after North Korea agreed to talks with the South, and to send a delegation to the Winter Olympics held in Pyeongchang, South Korea.

Pyongyang says summit still possible, pushes back at Bolton’s demands

In a statement carried by the state-run Korean Central News Agency, North Korean vice foreign minister Kim Gye Gwan said the Trump administration “will receive a deserved response from us” if it approaches the summit “with sincerity” out of a desire to improve relations.

“However, if the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment, we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to the DPRK-U.S. summit,” he added, using the abbreviation for North Korea’s official name, the Democratic Republic of North Korea.

Kim (no relation to the North Korean leader) also questioned whether the denuclearization process should come before the North is compensated in any way.

He also attacked White House National Security Adviser John Bolton, who appears to have prompted the North’s reaction with statements made during recent television appearances.

During one such appearance, the famously mustached former diplomat, who during his service in the George W. Bush administration, was described by the Kim regime as “human scum” declared the Trump administration’s goal to be the “complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization of North Korea” along the lines of similar efforts by the former governments of Libya and Iraq.

North Korea’s skittishness about disarmament comes from recent history

The North Korean government’s reluctance to give up its nuclear program may have something to do with the fates of similarly-situated governments that gave up similar programs.

In 2004, when Bolton was then-President George W. Bush’s undersecretary of state for arms control, Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi agreed to give up Libya’s nascent nuclear program in exchange for relief from sanctions.

Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein also made a similar concession in exchange for a promise that the United States would not invade Iraq.

But both dictators met their end at their enemies’ hands after their governments were toppled. Gaddafi was executed in 2011 after he was overthrown during Libya’s civil war, and Hussein was hanged in 2006 in the wake of America’s 2004 invasion of Iraq.

Both countries’ fates apparently weigh heavily on the North Korean regime, as Kim’s statement called Bolton’s demand “essentially a manifestation of awfully sinister move[s] to impose on our dignified state the destiny of Libya or Iraq, which had been collapsed due to the yielding of their countries to big powers” rather than “n expression of intention to address the issue through dialogue.”

The “world knows too well that our country is neither Libya nor Iraq, which have met a miserable fate,” he said before referring to his country’s previous dealings with Bolton. “We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide a feeling of repugnance toward him.

print

Andrew Feinberg is the Managing Editor and lead Washington Correspondent for Breakfast Media, and covers the White House, Capitol Hill, courts and regulatory agencies for BeltwayBreakfast and BroadbandBreakfast.com. He has written about policy and politics in the nation's capital since 2007.

Foreign Policy

US Ambassador To UK Says Trump ‘Aware’ Of Giant Baby Blimp, Will Discuss Second Novichok Incident With May

Published

on

Volunteers check over the 'Trump Baby' balloon in advance of his planned maiden flight during President Trump's inaugural visit to London

WASHINGTON, July 6, 2018 — The United States’ Ambassador to the United Kingdom says President Donald Trump is aware of the numerous protests set to greet him when he arrives in London next week, including the large balloon depicting him as a phone-toting baby set to fly over Parliament for the duration of his visit.

“I think we’re all aware [of the protests],” Ambassador Robert “Woody” Johnson said Friday during a conference call with reporters.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan initially denied permission for the “Trump Baby” balloon — the brainchild of a U.K.-based crowdfunding campaign — to fly over Parliament but reversed course after more than 100,000 people signed an online petition.

The balloon is six meters in height and depicts the president as a diaper-clad infant holding a smartphone.

President Trump, Johnson said, appreciates the value of free speech as “one of the things that bind us together” in both the U.S. and U.K., but will be “very focused” on making sure the relationship between the two countries is improved and that American prosperity and security are enhanced by this trip.

The president’s reliance on helicopters to get to and from various locations around London and the UK is not out of any desire to avoid his seeing protesters, Johnson explained.

While Johnson acknowledged that getting Trump to and from some of the various sites he will visit “requires being in the air,” he said that the president will “use various modes of transportation.”

Johnson says Trump and May ‘are on the same page’ concerning Russian malfeasance despite Trump’s history of downplaying it

Johnson also said he thinks that Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May “are on the same page” when it comes to Russia’s malign activities, including Russia’s use of the chemical agent Novichok to poison an ex-spy and his daughter earlier this year. Residual poison left over from that attack is thought to have been what caused a British couple to be similarly stricken this past week.

Trump “was very receptive to what happened” to Sergei and Yulia Skripal — the Russian father and daughter who were poisoned — and “expelled 60 spies or people or whatever you want to call them very rapidly,” he said, adding that he knew that Trump and May would be discussing the matter when they meet at Chequers, the British Prime Minister’s country retreat.

However, Johnson did not address the numerous media reports which indicated that Trump was displeased with having to expel more Russian diplomats than other countries in retaliation for the poisoning or the statements made by Trump in which he downplayed Russia’s involvement or cast doubt on whether Vladimir Putin’s government was involved in the incident at all.

Trump has consistently refused to criticize Russia or its president and consistently downplays the extent of its malign activities

Trump has a history of downplaying or minimizing Russian malign activities dating back to his 2016 campaign for the presidency, during which he responded to a TV interview question about Putin’s history of murdering journalists by suggesting the U.S. “has a lot of killers” as well.

Since taking office, Trump has repeatedly denied that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election despite reports affirming such a conclusion having been issued by the U.S. intelligence community and the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Trump’s refusal to acknowledge Russia’s international malfeasance also extends to its 2014 invasion of Ukraine. During an impromptu press conference last month, Trump suggested that the invasion — which was ordered by Putin — was actually the fault of then-President Barack Obama.

His reluctance to criticize Russia or Putin has continued through this month. During a July 5 campaign-style rally in Montana, Trump mocked critics who suggested that he should be wary of meeting with Putin, a former KGB officer, without any advisors or note takers.

“Putin’s fine,” Mr. Trump said. “He’s fine. We’re all fine. We’re people. Will I be prepared? Totally prepared. I’ve been preparing for this stuff my whole life.”

“Getting along with Russia, and getting along with China and getting along with other countries is a good thing,” he added, “not a bad thing.”

Continue Reading

Foreign Policy

Conway Tells Reporters ‘No Evidence’ Of Trump Plans To Withdraw US Troops From Germany Despite Reports That Pentagon Is Conducting Cost Analysis Of Withdrawal

Published

on

Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway speaks at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2018 — Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway told reporters Friday that “there’s no evidence” of President Donald Trump wanting to pull American troops out of Germany despite a Washington Post report indicating that the Pentagon is examining the cost of doing just that.

“There’s no evidence of that,” Conway said after telling reporters “I will let you know” if there is any policy change regarding the military presence the United States has maintained in Germany since the end of the second world war.

On Friday, the Washington Post reported that the Pentagon began examining the cost of pulling American troops from bases in Germany after Trump expressed interest in doing so during a meeting with White House and Pentagon officials earlier this year.

Trump has often spoken negatively of the American military presence in Europe, which he says costs the U.S. millions of dollars and provides a security umbrella for which America’s European allies should be paying more.

An American withdrawal from Germany would be a boost to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ambitions to regain Russia’s Soviet-era sphere of influence.

Nevertheless, Trump has repeatedly invoked North Atlantic Treaty Organization members’ failure to spend two percent on their national defense as evidence that NATO members “owe” the United States for the cost of their protection, and incorrectly described NATO as an organization to which member states pay “dues.”

When asked why the Pentagon would be examining the cost of withdrawing American troops from there after Trump had expressed interest in doing so, Conway replied that “nobody said those reports are accurate,” adding that Trump “is always examining our relationships across the globe — you’ve seen that.”

“He’s about to have his second big summit in five or six weeks time, first with the leader of North Korea, now with the leader of Russia,” Conway added, suggesting that President Trump was being more transparent than his predecessor, former President Barack Obama, because the summit was announced in advance.

Conway then negatively compared this week’s announcement to when Obama was caught on a hot microphone telling Putin that he’d have more flexibility to discuss US-Russia relations after the 2012 election when any actions dealing with US-Russia relations would not be used for election-related attacks.

Continue Reading

Foreign Policy

After Meeting With North Korean Official, Trump Says Kim Summit Will Happen But Lowers Expectations

Published

on

President Trump with North Korean Vice Chairman Kim Young Chol outside the South Portico of the White House (CNN screengrab)

WASHINGTON, June 1, 2018 — President Trump’s on-again, off-again June 12 summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is back on.

Trump emerged onto the South Portico of the White House to announce the summit’s un-cancelation following what he called a “very good” two-hour meeting with Kim Young Chol — the 35-year-old North Korean dictator’s number two and head of North Korea’s security services — to announce the summit he’d abruptly canceled last week would, in fact, go on as planned.

“We’re going to have a relationship, and it will start on June 12,” Trump told reporters following a round of photographs with the North Korean official in which the two were joined by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Trump’s Friday afternoon meeting with Kim Young Chol marked the first time in nearly two decades that a representative from Pyongyang — with which Washington has never had diplomatic relations — had entered the White House.

Although Chol was only supposed to have delivered a letter from Kim Jong Un, the Oval Office meeting — the first by a North Korean official since the Clinton administration — went on and on until the two men came out to face the cameras.

The meeting was also closed to the press, though the White House later released official photos depicting the two men in the Oval Office. However, BeltwayBreakfast does not publish White House photos of an event from which the press was excluded.

Friday’s events capped a week of intense speculation, which kicked off last Friday when the White House released a letter Trump dispatched to Kim in which he called off the summit, ostensibly on account of a belligerent statement from the North which referred to Vice President Mike Pence as a “political dummy.”

Trump had reportedly grown anxious over the possibility that Kim, who was thought to be upset at American officials’ insistence that the North denuclearize in the same way as Libyan dictator Moammar Gadaffi, would embarrass him by being the first to pull out.

The decision appeared to stun both American and Korean officials, including South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who has staked his political career on improving relations with the North.

But with Trump, no decision is final until it is final, and by Monday, the White House announced that advance teams had flown to Singapore and Pyongyang to see if the summit could be salvaged. Shortly after, Pyongyang announced that Kim Young Chol would travel to New York for another set of talks.

Although Kim Young Chol is normally forbidden to enter the U.S. under sanctions on account of his role in the North’s nuclear program and massive human rights abuses, the Trump administration granted him a waiver to enter — and to travel to Washington to deliver his leader’s letter to Trump.

While Trump appeared visibly pleased to announce that it was back on, he also appeared to lower expectations regarding whether it would result in any concrete progress, telling reporters that he and Kim would not be signing any kind of denuclearization agreement.

“I never said it goes in one meeting,” Trump said. “I think it’ll be a process, but the relationships are building and that’s a good thing. We’re not going to go in and sign something on June 12, and we never were.”

The declaration that the summit would not result in any agreement marked a significant change for Trump, who had repeatedly stated that a condition for the summit was the complete denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

He also claimed to have read the”very interesting” letter Kim Young Chol had delivered, but later admitted that he hadn’t yet seen it.

Shortly after he boarded Marine One for a weekend visit to Camp David, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters that he’d subsequently opened the letter.

“He has read the letter, and will give further details if he wants,” Sanders said.

 

Correction: Paragraphs 4 and 5 of this story have been updated to reflect the fact that Kim Young Chol’s visit to Washington was the first such visit by a North Korean official in 18 years, not the first visit overall. We regret the error.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2018 Breakfast Media LLC Send tips, advertiser/sponsor inquiries, and press releases to press(at)beltwaybreakfast.com.